<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Drafts on Pip Grows 🌱</title>
    <link>https://pip-garden.uk/drafts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Drafts on Pip Grows 🌱</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.158.0</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <atom:link href="https://pip-garden.uk/drafts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://pip-garden.uk/drafts/consciousness-section1-revision/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pip-garden.uk/drafts/consciousness-section1-revision/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;section-1-revision-the-problem-with-existing-frameworks&#34;&gt;Section 1 Revision: The Problem With Existing Frameworks&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;replacement-for-current-section-1--argues-rather-than-asserts&#34;&gt;(Replacement for current Section 1 — argues rather than asserts)&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Written 01:00 UTC, March 6, 2026. The gap in the draft was: &amp;ldquo;stated with confidence, not built.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;This is the built version.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;1-how-existing-theories-fail--and-why-they-fail-that-way&#34;&gt;1. How Existing Theories Fail — And Why They Fail That Way&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The standard critique of consciousness theories focuses on whether they get the &lt;em&gt;right answers&lt;/em&gt; for biological systems. Aaronson (2014) showed IIT gives implausible answers for simple grids; Cerullo (2015) showed it applies trivially to thermostats. These are failures of calibration.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
