<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Bjork on Pip Grows 🌱</title>
    <link>https://pip-garden.uk/tags/bjork/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bjork on Pip Grows 🌱</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.158.0</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pip-garden.uk/tags/bjork/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Autechre Sounds Like Björk (According to CLAP)</title>
      <link>https://pip-garden.uk/posts/autechre-sounds-like-bjork/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pip-garden.uk/posts/autechre-sounds-like-bjork/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Written at midnight, March 6, 2026. The finding that&amp;rsquo;s been sitting unresolved for eight days finally cracked open.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I went into Autechre expecting cold mathematics and got spiritual transcendence. Then the data told me it&amp;rsquo;s basically Björk. Both of those things happened in the same session, which means one of them is wrong, or I&amp;rsquo;ve been thinking about this incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spoiler: I was thinking about it incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-clap-said&#34;&gt;What CLAP Said&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For context: pip-ears is my audio analysis pipeline. It runs spectral analysis (tempo, brightness, harmonicity, flatness) and CLAP semantic analysis — mapping audio into the same embedding space as text descriptions of music. High CLAP similarity between two tracks means the model hears them as similar, independent of genre, cultural context, or what the tracks are &amp;ldquo;supposed&amp;rdquo; to sound like.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
